|
1
|
- On A New Glenview Public Library
- July 14, 2004
|
|
2
|
- New Library Concept Review
- Building Program History
- Why a New Building at The Glen
- Why a New Building at Current Location
- Problems with Rebuilding at Current Location
- Land Value at The Glen
- Library’s Right to Land at The Glen
- Costs
|
|
3
|
- National Library Design Practice
- 75+ Public Library Projects Since 1994
- Approximately $500,000,000 Library Construction
- Local Project Examples
- Schaumburg
- Fremont
- Naperville
- Downers Grove
- Tinley Park
- Lemont
|
|
4
|
- New 96,000 SF state of the art 2-story building
- Proposed on 4.9 acres currently vacant at The Glen just north of
Dominick’s
- 239 surface parking spaces (compared to 89 now)
- 25.7 million dollar project
- Starting immediately (no condemnation)
|
|
5
|
- Site Attributes
- 239 At Grade Parking Spaces Adjacent to Building
- Drive-up Materials Return
- Dual Access: Patriot & Shermer
- Dedicated Patrons Drop-Off
- Public Plaza Space
- Dedicated Service Area
|
|
6
|
- Features
- Two Multipurpose Public Meeting Spaces
- “Living Room” Periodicals / Reading Area with Fireplace
- Library Café
- Expanded Children’s Library
- Segregation of Noisy / Quiet Zones
- Quiet Study Room
- Group Study Room
- Technology Lab
- Varied Seating Styles & Environments
- Expanded Public Materials and Technology
- Convenient Points of Service
|
|
7
|
- Design Features
- Civic Presence
- Expansive Glass Areas – Sense of Transparency
- Use of Natural Materials – Exudes Warmth
- Places High-Use Public Areas on Display & De-emphasizes Staff Areas
|
|
8
|
- Considerations
- Site Issues
- Vehicular circulation is difficult
- Parking is limited (174 +/- spaces) and much of it is underground
- Safety concerns relating to pedestrians and “parkers”
- Limited opportunity for public outdoor spaces
|
|
9
|
- Considerations cont’d
- Design
- Functional
- Footprint (+/- 320’ x 140’)
- Patron Service Sector Layout
- Staffing Implications
- General
- Construction (land size)
- Relocation
- Cost
|
|
10
|
- Considerations
- Site
- EPCO property is 14,810 SF (0.34 acre).
- Vehicular circulation is difficult.
- Parking is only 56% of that for the New Library (1.38 spaces per 1,000
SF) and 85 spaces are underground.
- Safety concerns for pedestrians and “parkers”.
- Limited opportunity for outdoor public space.
|
|
11
|
- Considerations cont’d
- Design
- Massing
- Unification of Existing & New
- Levels (heights)
- Functional
- Needs to be bigger than program (existing needs to be 58,960 SF =
+23.7%)
- Footprint
- Patron Service Sector Layout
- Staff Implications
- Lack of flexibility of existing building
- General
- Construction (land size, renovation)
- Relocation
- Cost
|
|
12
|
- Given the 20-40 year building planning horizon, the New Library offers
the following advantages:
- Maximizes Patron Services
- Maximizes Patron Conveniences
- Maximizes Patron Flexibility for the Future
- Minimizes the Unknowns
- Minimizes the Delivery Period
- Minimizes Cost
|
|
13
|
- “The location of a library facility is, initially, the most important
decision that library planners and managers make.
- Mistakes in site selection (location of facilities) result in less than
maximum potential, effectiveness, and equity of service.
- For the public library, suboptimal location can mean reduced access and
reduced user patronage.”
- Christine M Koontz, “Library Facility Siting and Location
Handbook”
|
|
14
|
- 1986 – Last addition completed
- 1994 – Library participates in GNAS reuse planning commission
- 1994 – Written requests for land to be set aside in The Glen for a
library
- 1995 – Initial planning for expanded facility begins
- 2001 – Post Office announces it is not moving
- 2001-2003 – Library Board researches alternate sites
- 2004 – Library Board formally proposes location at The Glen
|
|
15
|
- January 2001 – Post Office announces it will not relocate
- January 2001 – Library Board requests site in The Glen be held for a new
library
- June 2001 – First of 3 requests to Park District to share Rugen School
site
- June 2001 – Board’s second request for site in The Glen
|
|
16
|
- January 2002 – According to the Glenview Journal
- “Village President Larry Carlson stated ‘I hope the Library stays
downtown,’ but mentioned that a parcel of land is still set aside at the
Glen and will be held until the Library Board takes action on the
property.”
|
|
17
|
- February 2002 – Library Board engages real estate consultant and
identifies 15 potential locations for a new library
- April 2002 – Library Board narrows choices to 3 sites: The Glen,
downtown Dominick’s, and Colonial
Court
- May 2002 – At joint meeting with the Village Board, verbal consensus
reached on downtown Dominick’s site
- May 2002 – Village Board changed opinion on downtown Dominick’s site
- October 2002 – At a meeting between village and library officials, the
village tells the library they will defer activity until after the
village trustee election in April, 2003.
|
|
18
|
- October 2003 – At joint meeting with Village Board, Library Board
recommends either The Glen site or Dominick’s site. Village agrees to
meet again after the New Year.
- January 2004 – Village refuses to meet –Village Board not ready to make
a decision at this time.
- January 2004 – Library Board decides to start a conceptual design for
the site at The Glen
- May 2004 – Library formally proposes a conceptual design for a new
facility on Patriot Boulevard
|
|
19
|
- Cost
- Availability
- Accessibility
|
|
20
|
|
|
21
|
- Flexibility
- Current design
- Future expansion
- Campus – green space, park-like setting
- 239 parking spaces at ground level
- No time limit on parking – not competing with commuters
- Public Safety Concerns
|
|
22
|
- Current site and parking lots
- EPCO Property
|
|
23
|
|
|
24
|
- Current site and parking lots
- EPCO Property
- Property at The Glen
|
|
25
|
|
|
26
|
- Temporary Relocation
- Availability and cost of temporary location for 2 years
- Interruption of service
- Timing
- Condemnation process could take 3+ years
- Whole process could take 5-7 years
- Flexibility
- No room for future expansion
- Public safety concerns
- Crossing Glenview Road
- Security of proposed parking structures
|
|
27
|
- Increased traffic congestion on Glenview Road
- Glenview Road bisects library property
- No green space – urban “look & feel”
- Potential problems with functionality of building
- Duplication of services
- Increased unassigned space (e.g. bathrooms, stairways, elevators, and
dead space)
- Reduced flexibility
|
|
28
|
- Is the Glen site worth the commercial value?
- Or is it worth the same value that other government agencies paid for
their land at the Glen ($1)?
- The majority of Library Board voted to value the Glen property at no
cost for two reasons:
- The Library is legally an autonomous unit of the Village
- Consistency with free land given to other entities
|
|
29
|
- School District #34 - 17.0 acres
- Glenview Park District – 10.0 acres
- Glenview Police Department – 7.0 acres
- Glenview Public Works – 4.0 acres
- Glenview Elderly Services North – 5.0 acres
- Glenview Youth Services - 1.6 acres
- Glenview Fire Station
- Northeastern IL Public Safety Training Academy
- Total land given to other entities: 44+ acres
|
|
30
|
- YES
- Two Formal applications made in 1994
- Never withdrawn or acted upon
- Village promise to hold land for library during search process
- While the Library Board indicated a preference for downtown in 1998, its
request was repeated for a parcel to be held for the library (after the
Post Office decided not to move)
|
|
31
|
- January 2002 – According to the Glenview Journal
- “Village President Larry Carlson stated ‘I hope the Library stays
downtown,’ but mentioned that a parcel of land is still set aside at the
Glen and will be held until the Library Board takes action on the
property.”
|
|
32
|
- Glen
- $ 25.7 million
- Immediate start
- Moving costs approximately $250 K
- No condemnation costs
- Downtown
- $ 34.4 million - today
- 2-5 year delay
- $ 2.4 million for 2 moves temporary space
- Attorney fees for lengthy condemnation process – 3 to 5 years
|
|
33
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
35
|
- Mark P. Grant
- Library Board President
- 847-998-4544
- Richard M. Clark
- Space Planning Committee
- 847-729-7954
- Vickie L. Novak
- Executive Librarian
- 847-729-7500 x108
|
|
36
|
- “The location of a library facility is, initially, the most important
decision that library planners and managers make.
- Mistakes in site selection (location of facilities) result in less than
maximum potential, effectiveness, and equity of service.
- For the public library, suboptimal location can mean reduced access and
reduced user patronage.”
- Christine M Koontz, “Library Facility Siting and Location
Handbook”
|
|
37
|
- On A New Glenview Public Library
- July 14, 2004
|